Community Safety Blotter & Activity
(To view other weekly Blotters and CS activity go here.)
December 23, 2024 - December 29, 2024
Weekly Activity:
Alarm checks: 10
Animal issue responses: 0
AOD interactions: 0
Building patrols: 524
Candle/incense violation interactions: 0
Community assistance responses: 0
Escorts: 0
Fire responses: 0
Foot patrols: 109
Held door checks: 4
Maintenance issue responses: 0
Medical assistance responses: 0
Noise complaint responses: 0
Suspicious circumstance responses: 6
Theft reports taken: 0
Unlocks: 21
Vehicle patrols: 224
Vehicle assistance responses: 0
Welfare check responses: 0
Weekly Reports:
The office of Community Safety invites all community members to provide feedback to us on our services by using the Let Us Know How We’re Doing on our website. Feedback may be made anonymously or with your name and contact information if you would like follow up.
Narcan doses discovered missing this week: 0
Case #: 240490
Date: 2024 12 23
Time: 1314
Description: Alcohol Violation
Location: RCAs
Notes: A CSO responded to a request for assistance from Residence Life staff at an RCA apartment. The staff encountered an alcohol bottle in a room recently vacated by an underage student. The CSO determined that the bottle was empty, photographed it for records, and cleared from the scene.
Case #: 240491 - VOID REPORT
Case #: 240492
Date: 2024 12 25
Time: 1239
Description: Information Only
Location: Campus
Notes: An alum called to provide information regarding a report from when they were attending Reed in 2010.
Case #: 240493
Date: 2024 12 29
Time: 1220
Description: Information Only
Location: Off-Campus
Notes: A non-community member called to report sexual misconduct and theft of property by a current Reed community member.
CS Survey Responses
Every week Community Safety requests survey responses from those who've had interactions with a member of the Community Safety team. These responses are always collected anonymously with the option for the responder to leave contact information if they would like for a member of Community Safety management to contact them, and are used internally for departmental performance tracking. Community Safety has opted to publish these survey results for transparency and community accountability. *Names and pronouns mentioned in survey responses will be redacted to protect the privacy of individuals.
In addition to surveys sent directly to those who have interacted with Community Safety, the Reed community is always encouraged to independently complete the survey regarding Community Safety's performance.
You can take the survey here:
Responses collected 12 30 2024
Unlock
Met expectations
Vehicle Assist
Met expectations
Unlock
Surpassed expectations
CSO was fun, helpful, and understanding. Good time 10/10
Unlock
Met expectations
Unlock
Surpassed expectations
Medical Assist
Below expectations
When responding to a first degree burn, community safety procedure was well below expectations. The only reason we called CSOs was because our first aid kit was out of the necessary medical tape and sterile gauze that should be used in covering a burn. Despite their supposed first aid certification, the responding CSOs were unable to distinguish between self adhering medical tape and gauze, resulting in the self adhering medical tape being wrapped directly onto the burn. This caused pain to the patient. I am appalled by this response and would hope that you would not consider this response outside of CSO purview. Because if you can’t respond to something as simple as a first degree burn, why would Anyone ever call CSOs for medical intervention? And how are you certified? CSOs need to have their first aid response tested and their knowledge retaught, clearly.
| Unlock | Met expectations | ||
| Vehicle Assist | Met expectations | ||
| Unlock | Surpassed expectations | CSO was fun, helpful, and understanding. Good time 10/10 | |
| Unlock | Met expectations | ||
| Unlock | Surpassed expectations | ||
| Medical Assist | Below expectations | When responding to a first degree burn, community safety procedure was well below expectations. The only reason we called CSOs was because our first aid kit was out of the necessary medical tape and sterile gauze that should be used in covering a burn. Despite their supposed first aid certification, the responding CSOs were unable to distinguish between self adhering medical tape and gauze, resulting in the self adhering medical tape being wrapped directly onto the burn. This caused pain to the patient. I am appalled by this response and would hope that you would not consider this response outside of CSO purview. Because if you can’t respond to something as simple as a first degree burn, why would Anyone ever call CSOs for medical intervention? And how are you certified? CSOs need to have their first aid response tested and their knowledge retaught, clearly. |